The current crisis of Choice
When we explain the working of the Akaija to people, we often tell them that it offers them the safety to make choices. We also explain that it’s not about making the ‘ideal’ choice, but that it’s about making a conscious choice. So that it is your choice and not someone else’s, or an emotional choice, or out of obedience, etc. If that choice later turns out differently than you expected is not important, because you have made a conscious choice and you do not have to blame yourself that it turned out differently than you hoped, you could not have done better at that moment. In order to be able to make a conscious choice, you first have to be aware of what influences you.
Right here and now, in this time frame, the key question is: Why do you let yourself be injected or not, or boosted?
Anyone who is very afraid seeks safety, preferably as quickly as possible. That is our flight instinct. If you are very afraid of Corona and someone offers you a solution to protect you from it, you will be more receptive to that solution than if you are not afraid.
We noticed the vast majority of people were very afraid during the first months of the Corona crisis because people walked around us in a circle in the forest. We don’t watch TV, so we were very surprised. What we also noticed was that there were almost no cars on the streets. We could even cross the whole city in no time at all during rush hour. Even crazier was what we experienced on the way to a meeting in central Germany. As soon as we crossed the border at Arnhem and drove towards Oberhausen, 70 kilometers away, it was as if we had landed in a scary film about the end of the world. The motorway in front of us was deserted. Over 70 kilometers, we saw no more than 10 vehicles. Far from home in Germany, this gave a very ‘unheimisch’ or uncanny feeling.
Anyone who does not take the trouble to look up information themselves is vulnerable to misinformation or fake news. Those who are naturally obedient are more likely to do what they are told. Those who have experienced a serious flu will be more inclined to accept a flu vaccine. On the other hand, someone who has experienced the side effects of any medicine will be more inclined to find out the truth about the medicine before ever taking it again. Such a person will also not readily say ‘yes’ to hastily produced completely new medical mRNA liquids that influence DNA. These liquids were discovered, produced and distributed by different factories almost at the same time, whereas normally it takes about 10 years to develop a new medicine. Finally, long-term effectiveness and safety must also be considered. These studies have been skipped. Yet these liquids are sometimes forced upon all the people of the world. That is more than enough reason to be extremely careful or even cautious.
Choices can change, especially if the first choice does not deliver what was expected. Unfortunately, in this case, either Covid as a disease or the Covid injection may have caused permanent damage. Had these people made more effort to inform themselves from both sides in time, this damage might have been preventable. Some of our friends consciously chose to be injected because otherwise they would not be able to visit their beloved friends and family. They took any side effects for granted. Admirable.
Shock Therapy opens the Eyes
What strikes me is that once people have come to trust a particular source of information, they are not easily tempted to question that source later, even if the evidence of its unreliability is presented to them from all sides. Those who have been misled apparently find it very difficult to face up to this. To get them out of it, it sometimes takes nothing less than a severe shock.
I can speak from my own experience, because Linda and I also trusted a charlatan during our alternative search who misled us terribly. She even made us lose contact with my parents for six months. One of the reasons why we trusted her was that many people we knew had been going to her for years. They had good experiences with this woman, who, according to them, channelled a long-dead beloved doctor from Colombia. Still, we got more and more indications that her (or his if the astral doctor really spoke through her) actions and statements were not correct. We finally got the impression that she and the translator had no idea how sick Linda really was. So, we wrote them a letter to correct that image, which makes no sense with a good medium.
Immediately afterwards, we received a phone call saying that Linda did not have to come again, because with all the blood that had been administered to her in the hospital, the astral doctor could not reach Linda. It was her own fault and she now had to prepare for her transition, even though the medium (or the astral doctor) had said two days earlier how well Linda was doing.
That message hit hard. And it was this blow that made us both ‘wake up’. The shock was administered by the charlatan himself. Other people had not been able to convince us. We had seen the clues yes, but we had ignored them. Only this shock could open our eyes. Afterwards, we felt as if we had been in a cult and suddenly realised what we had delivered ourselves into. We had done it ourselves!
During her illness, I guided Linda in visualisation, during which she met Amá, an astral friend whom she could ‘see’ and talk to. That contact was invaluable during that very difficult time when all Light seemed to have gone out. After this event, Linda asked Amá, “Why didn’t you warn us?” Amá’s answer was as simple as to-the-point: “You wouldn’t have believed me and then you would have cut off our contact.”
For the same reason we often hesitate in speaking to people about sensitive topics when we have very different insights. After all, many friendships and even marriages have ended recently because of this.
Now I don’t mean to say that we suddenly trusted the hospital again, or that we renounced the other alternative therapists we visited. We just became very careful to put our trust in others. In spite of this experience, we met very competent and loving people in both alternative and regular circles. What connected them is that they listened to us, took us seriously and thought along with us. They respected our choice and did not judge us, even though they might have had a different opinion. They did their work from the Heart, with Love.
